Office of the Indpendent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA): Handling reports of harrassment and sexual misconduct
Date of Submission: 6 February 2026
The framework is clear and logically structured, but it would benefit from clearer Phase 1 and Phase 2 signposting and a simple quick‑reference flowchart. Early clarification of the term “report” and the use of a more neutral label such as “Affected Person” would improve consistency, alongside explicit recognition of FE safeguarding duties for under‑18s and adults at risk. Stronger differentiation between FE and HE contexts, clearer guidance on anonymous reports, trauma‑informed initial responses, proportionate risk assessments and limits on mediation - especially with under‑18s - would add clarity. Partnerships should define a single learner contact point, shared training and clear escalation routes, while guidance should reflect that FE relies more on staff-led processes than student unions. Overall, the framework is robust but would benefit from clearer safeguarding distinctions, practical examples and improved usability for FE settings.
Further Information
Office of the Indpendent Adjudicator for Higher Education (OIA)
Handling reports of harrassment and sexual misconduct
Amy Williams, Policy Officer
Amy.Williams@ColegauCymru.ac.uk
